Abstract
The authors regret that in Fig. 1a of the manuscript, the legend needs to be corrected. In the legend where it reads Kaapvaal Copper Belt should read as the Kalahari Copper Belt and where it reads Kalahari Craton should read as the Kaapvaal Craton. A new figure with corrected legend is reproduced below. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 103874 |
Journal | Ore Geology Reviews |
Volume | 127 |
DOIs |
|
Publication status | Published - Dec 2020 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Geology
- Geochemistry and Petrology
- Economic Geology