Erratum: A remarkable recurrent nova in M31: Discovery and optical/UV observations of the predicted 2014 eruption (Astronomy and Astrophysics (2015) 580 (A45) DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201526027)

M. J. Darnley, M. Henze, I. A. Steele, M. F. Bode, V. A.R.M. Ribeiro, P. Rodríguez-Gil, A. W. Shafter, S. C. Williams, D. Baer, I. Hachisu, M. Hernanz, K. Hornoch, R. Hounsell, M. Kato, S. Kiyota, H. Kučáková, H. Maehara, J. U. Ness, A. S. Piascik, G. SalaI. Skillen, R. J. Smith, M. Wolf

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debatepeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

An error has been identified in Table 3 of Darnley et al. (2015). The original table of fluxes included the incorrect unit (×10-15Wm-2). The correct unit should have been (×10-15erg cm-2s-1), and hence a discrepancy of a factor of 1000 was introduced. No other parts of the paper, nor the results reported within, were a ected by this error.We have included a corrected version in Table 1. (Table Presented).

Original languageEnglish
Article numberC3
JournalAstronomy and Astrophysics
Volume593
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 1 2016

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
  • Space and Planetary Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Erratum: A remarkable recurrent nova in M31: Discovery and optical/UV observations of the predicted 2014 eruption (Astronomy and Astrophysics (2015) 580 (A45) DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201526027)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this