Abstract
An error has been identified in Table 3 of Darnley et al. (2015). The original table of fluxes included the incorrect unit (×10-15Wm-2). The correct unit should have been (×10-15erg cm-2s-1), and hence a discrepancy of a factor of 1000 was introduced. No other parts of the paper, nor the results reported within, were a ected by this error.We have included a corrected version in Table 1. (Table Presented).
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | C3 |
Journal | Astronomy and Astrophysics |
Volume | 593 |
DOIs |
|
Publication status | Published - Sept 1 2016 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Astronomy and Astrophysics
- Space and Planetary Science