TY - JOUR
T1 - Integrated and consolidated review of plastic waste management and bio-based biodegradable plastics
T2 - Challenges and opportunities
AU - Mazhandu, Zvanaka S.
AU - Muzenda, Edison
AU - Mamvura, Tirivaviri A.
AU - Belaid, Mohamed
AU - Nhubu, Trust
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding: This research was funded by the University of Johannesburg and Botswana International University of Science and Technology.
Funding Information:
Acknowledgments: The authors are grateful to the University of Johannesburg and the Botswana International University of Science and Technology for the financial and technical support.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
Copyright:
Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2020/10/2
Y1 - 2020/10/2
N2 - Cumulative plastic production worldwide skyrocketed from about 2 million tonnes in 1950 to 8.3 billion tonnes in 2015, with 6.3 billion tonnes (76%) ending up as waste. Of that waste, 79% is either in landfills or the environment. The purpose of the review is to establish the current global status quo in the plastics industry and assess the sustainability of some bio-based biodegradable plastics. This integrative and consolidated review thus builds on previous studies that have focused either on one or a few of the aspects considered in this paper. Three broad items to strongly consider are: Biodegradable plastics and other alternatives are not always environmentally superior to fossil-based plastics; less investment has been made in plastic waste management than in plastics production; and there is no single solution to plastic waste management. Some strategies to push for include: Increasing recycling rates, reclaiming plastic waste from the environment, and bans or using alternatives, which can lessen the negative impacts of fossil-based plastics. However, each one has its own challenges, and country-specific scientific evidence is necessary to justify any suggested solutions. In conclusion, governments from all countries and stakeholders should work to strengthen waste management infrastructure in low-and middle-income countries while extended producer responsibility (EPR) and deposit refund schemes (DPRs) are important add-ons to consider in plastic waste management, as they have been found to be effective in Australia, France, Germany, and Ecuador.
AB - Cumulative plastic production worldwide skyrocketed from about 2 million tonnes in 1950 to 8.3 billion tonnes in 2015, with 6.3 billion tonnes (76%) ending up as waste. Of that waste, 79% is either in landfills or the environment. The purpose of the review is to establish the current global status quo in the plastics industry and assess the sustainability of some bio-based biodegradable plastics. This integrative and consolidated review thus builds on previous studies that have focused either on one or a few of the aspects considered in this paper. Three broad items to strongly consider are: Biodegradable plastics and other alternatives are not always environmentally superior to fossil-based plastics; less investment has been made in plastic waste management than in plastics production; and there is no single solution to plastic waste management. Some strategies to push for include: Increasing recycling rates, reclaiming plastic waste from the environment, and bans or using alternatives, which can lessen the negative impacts of fossil-based plastics. However, each one has its own challenges, and country-specific scientific evidence is necessary to justify any suggested solutions. In conclusion, governments from all countries and stakeholders should work to strengthen waste management infrastructure in low-and middle-income countries while extended producer responsibility (EPR) and deposit refund schemes (DPRs) are important add-ons to consider in plastic waste management, as they have been found to be effective in Australia, France, Germany, and Ecuador.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85095715722&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85095715722&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/su12208360
DO - 10.3390/su12208360
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85095715722
SN - 2071-1050
VL - 12
SP - 1
EP - 57
JO - Sustainability (Switzerland)
JF - Sustainability (Switzerland)
IS - 20
M1 - 8360
ER -