TY - JOUR
T1 - Performance evaluation of CMIP6 HighResMIP models in simulating precipitation over Madagascar
AU - Randriatsara, Herijaona Hani Roge Hundilida
AU - Hu, Zhenghua
AU - Xu, Xiyan
AU - Ayugi, Brian
AU - Sian, Kenny Thiam Choy Lim Kam
AU - Mumo, Richard
AU - Ongoma, Victor
AU - Holtanova, Eva
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Royal Meteorological Society.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - The present study evaluates the performance of high-resolution global climate models derived from Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6 HighResMIP), in simulating rainfall characteristics over Madagascar on an annual and seasonal scales for the period 1981–2014. The models and their ensemble mean are assessed based on two observational datasets sourced from Climate Hazards Group Infrared Precipitation with Station data version 2 (CHIRPS v2.0) data and the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) reanalysis fifth generation-Land dataset (ERA5) as the references throughout the diverse analyses. A Taylor diagram, accompanied by the Taylor skill score (TSS), is used for the annual and seasonal model-rankings and the overall performance of the models. The best-performing models are EC-Earth3P-HR, ECMWF-IFS-HR, ECMWF-IFS-LR and HadGEM3-GC31-MM. The least-recommended models with remarkable biases are BCC-CSM2-HR, CAMS-CSM1-0, FGOALS-f3-H, MPI-ESM1-2-HR and MPI-ESM1-2-XR. It is worth mentioning that FGOALS-f3-H tends to overestimate rainfall in most analyses, while MPI-ESM1-2-HR and MPI-ESM1-2-XR underestimate it. The findings of this study are of great importance to climatologists and present an opportunity for further investigation of underlying processes responsible for the observed wet/dry biases in order to improve the forecast skills in the models over the study area.
AB - The present study evaluates the performance of high-resolution global climate models derived from Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6 HighResMIP), in simulating rainfall characteristics over Madagascar on an annual and seasonal scales for the period 1981–2014. The models and their ensemble mean are assessed based on two observational datasets sourced from Climate Hazards Group Infrared Precipitation with Station data version 2 (CHIRPS v2.0) data and the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) reanalysis fifth generation-Land dataset (ERA5) as the references throughout the diverse analyses. A Taylor diagram, accompanied by the Taylor skill score (TSS), is used for the annual and seasonal model-rankings and the overall performance of the models. The best-performing models are EC-Earth3P-HR, ECMWF-IFS-HR, ECMWF-IFS-LR and HadGEM3-GC31-MM. The least-recommended models with remarkable biases are BCC-CSM2-HR, CAMS-CSM1-0, FGOALS-f3-H, MPI-ESM1-2-HR and MPI-ESM1-2-XR. It is worth mentioning that FGOALS-f3-H tends to overestimate rainfall in most analyses, while MPI-ESM1-2-HR and MPI-ESM1-2-XR underestimate it. The findings of this study are of great importance to climatologists and present an opportunity for further investigation of underlying processes responsible for the observed wet/dry biases in order to improve the forecast skills in the models over the study area.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85162984234&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85162984234&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/joc.8153
DO - 10.1002/joc.8153
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85162984234
SN - 0899-8418
VL - 43
SP - 5401
EP - 5421
JO - International Journal of Climatology
JF - International Journal of Climatology
IS - 12
ER -