TY - JOUR
T1 - Predicting adverse drug reactions in oncology
T2 - A critical review of machine learning approaches and future directions
AU - Yahya, Abid
AU - Lobelo, Phatsimo
AU - Eram, Afiya
AU - Hussain, Sana Althaf
AU - Badruddin, Irfan Anjum
AU - Bulay-og, Lory Liza D.
AU - Albina, Dionel O.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025
PY - 2025/9
Y1 - 2025/9
N2 - Because of polypharmacy and complicated treatment protocols, adverse drug reactions (ADRs) continue to be a major problem in oncology and frequently lead to serious clinical complications. Recent developments in the use of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) for ADR prediction in anticancer therapy are critically assessed in this review. We go over a variety of methods for utilizing both structured and unstructured clinical data, such as supervised, unsupervised, and deep learning models in addition to natural language processing (NLP) strategies. Strong performance has been demonstrated by ensemble techniques like Random Forest and Gradient Boosting, while deep neural networks allow for sophisticated feature extraction, albeit with interpretability issues. We highlight new integrative techniques based on current literature trends, such as integrating demographic information, treatment history, and physiological signals with CNN-based models and SHAP-based.
AB - Because of polypharmacy and complicated treatment protocols, adverse drug reactions (ADRs) continue to be a major problem in oncology and frequently lead to serious clinical complications. Recent developments in the use of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) for ADR prediction in anticancer therapy are critically assessed in this review. We go over a variety of methods for utilizing both structured and unstructured clinical data, such as supervised, unsupervised, and deep learning models in addition to natural language processing (NLP) strategies. Strong performance has been demonstrated by ensemble techniques like Random Forest and Gradient Boosting, while deep neural networks allow for sophisticated feature extraction, albeit with interpretability issues. We highlight new integrative techniques based on current literature trends, such as integrating demographic information, treatment history, and physiological signals with CNN-based models and SHAP-based.
KW - Adverse drug reactions (ADRs)
KW - Biomedical informatics
KW - Cancer therapy
KW - Clinical decision support
KW - Deep learning
KW - Machine learning
KW - Natural language processing (NLP)
KW - Oncology
KW - Pharmacovigilance
KW - Supervised learning
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105009492084
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=105009492084&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.rineng.2025.106002
DO - 10.1016/j.rineng.2025.106002
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:105009492084
SN - 2590-1230
VL - 27
JO - Results in Engineering
JF - Results in Engineering
M1 - 106002
ER -